There is a discussion on the Internet that centers on the One People’s Public Trust (OPPT) (see links to info on OPPT at bottom). One aspect of this discussion that has caught my avid interest concerns what many are calling the wizards behind the curtain.
As a student I delved into the book “Ancient Society, or Researches in the Lines of Human Progress from Savagery, through Barbarism to Civilization”, by Lewis H. Morgan. This book, published in 1877, was the result of his life’s work. Lewis Morgan was a pioneering American anthropologist and social theorist who worked as a railroad lawyer. He travelled among the tribes in North America for forty years documenting the social structure and collecting kinship data from a variety of Native American tribes. He had especially close ties to the Seneca Tribe, which adopted him 1846.
Morgan’s research and that of Johann Jakob Bachofen, (Mother Right: an investigation of the religious and juridical character of matriarchy in the Ancient World, 1861) led to the work of Friedrich Engels, “Origins of the Family, Private Property, and the State”.
This excerpt from the preface to Engels’ book shows us a point in human society at which law began to be an arbitrary means to an end.
“That among some peoples of ancient history, as well as among some savages still alive today, descent was reckoned, not from the father, but from the mother, and that the female line was therefore regarded as alone valid; … that abundant traces survive in old classical literature of a state prior to monogamy among the Greeks and Asiatics when not only did a man have sexual intercourse with several women, but a woman with several men, without offending against morality; that this custom did not disappear without leaving its traces in the limited surrender which was the price women had to pay for the right to monogamy; that therefore descent could originally be reckoned only in the female line, from mother to mother; that far into the period of monogamy, with its certain or at least acknowledged paternity, the female line was still alone recognized; and that the original position of the mothers, as the only certain parents of their children, secured for them, and thus for their whole sex, a higher social position than women have ever enjoyed since.”
Engels, following Morgan, writes that the modern family arises as part and parcel of the development of private property relations. He states that material objects (such as tools) and the produce of agriculture as well as the land itself, end up in the hands of males in society, due to the division of labor that takes place as women take on the primary role of bringing up children. Therefore the male lineage became important for the inheritance of wealth.
The male lineage had to be recorded as it could not be verified de facto at that time by science or other means. In this sense, the lineage and inheritance records were an arbitrary statement of lineage and not absolute: because a man and a woman lived in the legally defined “monogamous” relationship of marriage, the mother’s child was recorded as being offspring of the man as well.
Thus “Bourgeois law” developed and began to dictate the rules for relationships and inheritances, which are based on property rights. Prior to this development all objects of a society were used by the community and private property was unknown. This is, of course, a much abbreviated schematic of the actual social evolutionary process and the factors involved.
My point is that this example shows how ‘the laws’ by which we all now abide are based on arbitrariness. A huge structure called ‘government’ with all its appendages on all levels has been constructed on a foundation of arbitrariness and is able to ‘enforce’ its edicts because we all agree to follow them without objection. To say that we ‘agree’ is not quite correct. Our agreement is reached on the basis of ignorance on our part as to their actual validity and intimidation by the ‘law enforcement agencies’.
The time has come for this massive fraud to be blown open. It is happening and this article is part of that.
The following video report about one man’s ordeal when importing his vehicle from a foreign country shows some jaw-dropping facts about laws and ‘governance’ in our world today. His example is based in Australia but it soon becomes clear that it points to a similar, if not identical state of affairs in any country on Earth today. It is 50 minutes but you will not regret having made the time to watch it.
Two relevant articles: Corporations Masquerading as Government Parts 1 & 2
The One People’s Public Trust itself consists of every person on the planet, the planet itself and the Creator.
The One People’s Trust trustees are a group of very skilled individuals including legal professionals who, in conjunction with a positive group inside the financial system, carried out extensive investigations into the massive fraud and theft taking place at this time.
Below are also links to information on the One People’s Public Trust.
- One People’s Public Trust (OPPT): What Does It All Mean?(vision5d2012.wordpress.com)
- Layman’s Version of OPPT (www.riseearth.com)
- OPPT (www.peoplestrust1776.org)
- Hopegirl – OPPT Questions From The People – 9 February 2013 (lucas2012infos.wordpress.com)
- OPPT Gets Attention In The Mainstream Media – In the Money, Federal Reserve, World Banks Foreclosed On – 8 February 2013 (lucas2012infos.wordpress.com)
- List of Websites About the One People’s Public Trust – #OPPT Movement is Spreading Fast! (joy2theworld2012.wordpress.com)
- OPPT-IN Movement (oppt-in.com)